翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Pollokshields railway station
・ Pollokshields West railway station
・ Pollomuhku ja Posityyhtynen
・ Pollone
・ Pollos
・ Pollos Frisby
・ Polls before the Kenyan elections 2007
・ Pollsmoor Prison
・ Pollstar
・ Pollucite
・ Pollupalai and Vallimunai Wind Farms
・ Pollusca
・ Pollutant
・ Pollutant release and transfer register
・ Pollutant Standards Index
Polluter pays principle
・ Polluting Paradise
・ Pollution
・ Pollution (album)
・ Pollution (disambiguation)
・ Pollution (The Goodies)
・ Pollution and the Death of Man
・ Pollution at Morgan's Point (Bermuda)
・ Pollution haven hypothesis
・ Pollution in California
・ Pollution in Canada
・ Pollution in China
・ Pollution in New Zealand
・ Pollution in the Arctic Ocean
・ Pollution in the United States


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Polluter pays principle : ウィキペディア英語版
Polluter pays principle

In environmental law, the polluter pays principle is enacted to make the party responsible for producing pollution responsible for paying for the damage done to the natural environment. It is regarded as a regional custom because of the strong support it has received in most Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and European Community (EC) countries.
The polluter pays principle underpins environmental policy such as an ecotax, which, if enacted by government, deters and essentially reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Some eco-taxes underpinned by the polluter pays principle include: the Gas Guzzler Tax, in US, Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE)- a "polluter pays" fine. The U.S. Superfund law requires polluters to pay for cleanup of hazardous waste sites, when the polluters can be identified.〔U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Washington, DC (1996).("The Buck Stops Here: Polluters are Paying for Most Hazardous Waste Cleanups." ) ''Superfund Today'' (newsletter). Document No. EPA-540-K-96/004. June 1996.〕
The Polluter pays principle is also known as extended producer responsibility (EPR). This is a concept that was probably first described by Thomas Lindhqvist for the Swedish government in 1990.〔The International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics at Lund University, Sweden (2000).("Extended Producer Responsibility in Cleaner Production" ) Doctoral Dissertation (2000)〕 EPR seeks to shift the responsibility of dealing with waste from governments (and thus, taxpayers and society at large) to the entities producing it. In effect, it internalised the cost of waste disposal into the cost of the product, theoretically meaning that the producers will improve the waste profile of their products, thus decreasing waste and increasing possibilities for reuse and recycling.
OECD defines EPR as:

a concept where manufacturers and importers of products should bear a significant degree of responsibility for the environmental impacts of their products throughout the product life-cycle, including upstream impacts inherent in the selection of materials for the products, impacts from manufacturers’ production process itself, and downstream impacts from the use and disposal of the products. Producers accept their responsibility when designing their products to minimise life-cycle environmental impacts, and when accepting legal, physical or socio-economic responsibility for environmental impacts that cannot be eliminated by design.〔Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Environment Directorate, Paris, France (2006). ("Extended Producer Responsibility." ) Project Fact Sheet.〕

==In international environmental law==
In international environmental law it is mentioned in Principle 16 of the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Polluter pays principle」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.